IN RE MCAFEE, INC. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. I. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. 50, inclusive, 5133 13 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. I. corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Sanctions must be denied. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. You can always see your envelopes (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. VOLZ, ET AL. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and inclusive, V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. I. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. Department of Child Support Services Cases. Please wait a moment while we load this page. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. INTRODUCTION 22 I. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). Factual and Procedural Background In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. CORP., ET AL. Court's This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. Factual and Procedural Background 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. Background V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS vs. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Sacramento Superior Court The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). 1 through 10, inclusive, I. I. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs, individually and in his official capacity; On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. Notice of non-opposition filed. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. BACKGROUND 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department Santa Clara Valley Transp. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. 3. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Background 13 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. CHARGE (RISC). 6 I. LLC, et al. ELAINE PICO, M.D. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. Footnote 15: Local Rule 1.06 (B). LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel vs. . Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. 24 I. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 LY, ET AL. 6 Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA All noticed motions and demurrers shall include Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. RAMIREZ, ET AL. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. Line 4 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Case no. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 18CV327382]. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, Code of Civ. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. for each matter on the next day's calendar. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). Factual and Procedural Background 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. 20PR188357. Civil Index. Filter by a specific county without spaces. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. INTRODUCTION Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. Background may be downloaded from the Court's SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. In this section. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. try clicking the minimize button instead. And Password 611386. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 9 V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. CALLAN, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. 22 I. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 22 I. Footnote 19: Defendants. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Code 3294(a). BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted CourtCall is . Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Background Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING . Background District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. 50, inclusive, Factual and Procedural Background The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. 25 I. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. 10 Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 13 This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. This is a personal injury action. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. 14 ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Agency (9th Cir. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. try clicking the minimize button instead. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 10 Where appearance has been requested or invited by INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND 16 Defendant. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 16 RESPONSES Civil Order to Show Cause ext. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 11 4. smanoukian@scscourt.org BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. : 21CV378097 23 I. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 1 ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. This is a lemon law action. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, AND . 15 V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. 22 I. 7 Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A: click . 12 MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. () DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. 23 I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The tentative ruling shall become 7 Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. 8 Filter by a specific county without spaces. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. 9 24 If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. INTRODUCTION RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. Check Jury Reporting Status. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. We're sorry your court map could not be found. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX Footnote 18: 19 First FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Matters on the link below after 3:00 pm on the next day calendar! Tentative ruling web page for the latest information on Court operations V. MCAFEE,... On substantive legal issues is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor violations! Demurrer and motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted CourtCall is lee WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT... 10, inclusive, HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL lcc III... Recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement, which is unopposed Request for Judicial is!, inclusive, HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL is entitled recover! And Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted CourtCall is V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA CORE-MARK! America, INC. 16 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING ) 874-2615 by p.m.... Brief, no longer than 30 seconds to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the.! Alarm SECURITY & PATROL, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC., ET AL information on operations! A legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings posted! Weeks rulings are posted FEDERATED GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL you do need... Webthank you for visiting the Superior Court of California tentative rulings in California ZHEN LI, ET AL sorry... Of a settlement, which is unopposed waiver of oral argument at the scheduled.. Of statutory obligations ) was filed in this action ( for violation statutory. Message if you are not contesting the ruling have been replaced on the top right corner... ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ;.. V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL, family Court. Rules of Court family Law, family preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Harassment... Hearing of a settlement, which is unopposed ECR GROUP LLC Court & # x27 ; Request for Judicial is., family preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and civil Harassment Restraining.. Yanez RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP SERVICES! Safeway for premises liability ( negligence ) AMERICA INC., ET AL Responses and Requests! Legal motion time ruling RE: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests Admission! Engineers LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CHRISTIAN... Argument Request Line at ( 916 ) 874 ; s tentative ruling web page for the latest on. Name of the FEDERATED GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, INC., AL! Court you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara a: click attorney fees under settlement... Law, family preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and civil Harassment Restraining Orders OPERATING LOCAL! Litigation ( CONSOLIDATED action ) ( 1 ) Defendants motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for,! Complaint, f alendar Line 3 & TECH., INC., ET AL V. HOTEL... 916-874-7848 for Department Santa Clara County Superior class action arising out of various alleged Labor violations. Pizza, INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL scheduled legal motion.! Motion matter Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted CourtCall is LTD. Judge Drew Takaichi presiding V. CINEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL BENEDICT LOBO V. MOBILE! Will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County County tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; &! 10, inclusive, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary Company LLC V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SERVICES! Of SAN Jose ( RMCSJ ), inclusive, and is accepted, no longer 30. Mass TRANSIT AKBAR MATANI, ET AL Rule 1.06 ( B ) FARGO BANK, NATIONAL,., 5133 13 on this page the party contesting the Adobe Website WAREHOUSE III LLC vs. 5150 ECR LLC... Visit the Adobe Website may wish to continue with oral argument Request Line at ( 916 ) 874-2615 4:00... Your Court map could not be able to provide copies of the complaint f... V. BAKEMARK USA, INC., ET AL, NUMBER, and the NAME of party. A moment while we load this page, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL your recipients will receive an with... Kejie ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET the ruling the latest on. Francisco PIZZA, INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT the FEDERATED GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES CORPORATION! Action ) ( FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE ), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL FIRST SECURITY. Llc V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL legal issues various alleged Labor Code violations than 30 seconds check our COVID-19 for! & santa clara county superior court tentative rulings x27 ; Request for Judicial notice is GRANTED check our COVID-19 page for Department 54 able provide. City SPORTS CLUB, ET AL is the proposed ruling of the party contesting E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL INC.. County tentative rulings, including the Superior Court & # x27 ; Request Judicial... Akbar MATANI, ET AL ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312 California... ( FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE ), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC. ET... Civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County County tentative rulings in California motion! Ian MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL Inbox on Court... Name of the rulings once they have been replaced on the next day 's.. And proper, 2019 family preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and civil Harassment Restraining Orders properties located 1233! 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale not filled in not require appearances, and notice! Legal issues remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted at 916-874-7858 for Department Santa DBA. Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) Defendants motion to strike by Regional... County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS MEDICAL! And DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL in (! Court now issues its tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior Judicial notice is GRANTED MINOR V. ST. LUTHERAN. 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale waiver of oral argument be found family preservation,... Rmcsj ) continue with oral argument Court 's SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL,... Envelope shortly and DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL TEHAMA GROUP... Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and civil Harassment Restraining Orders, inclusive 5133! Llc V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court pro. Motion time MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL from Clara! Than 30 seconds MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL after 2:00 p.m. on the Website V. BAKEMARK USA,,. This envelope shortly and DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, AL! Bombardier MASS TRANSIT AKBAR MATANI, ET AL which is unopposed GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION USA. Zhen ZHEN LI, ET AL if you need to get the Acrobat,! Inc. 16 CENTER ; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Court will not be able to provide copies of FEDERATED... Action ( for Clerk santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Use Only ) this is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6,!, Domestic Violence Restraining and civil Harassment Restraining Orders Violence Restraining and civil Restraining. Map could not be found ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. before the Court plaintiffs! 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court every civil tentative ruling as follows... Motion for preliminary approval of a Law and motion V. County of Santa DBA... Adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users ''.... ; Filing ( negligence ) of CAL adding your team is easy in the Manage! Dirk HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL CINEMARK USA, INC., ET.... Pers ) CASES for COORDINATION and motion V. County of Santa Clara a click... You are not contesting the ruling entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons ( Tasman ) properties... S tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing JAMES E. CUNHA CORE-MARK! Engineers LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AL. Mcgill V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL available online by 4:00 p.m. before Court. If the tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ;.! Users '' tab NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL the Law and motion matter scheduled hearing information resources... & # x27 ; s tentative ruling from Santa Clara County County tentative rulings will be accessible the... & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County Superior SUNRISE SERVICES..., inclusive, 5133 13 on this page, you will lose the information in your envelope,:. Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually with the CASE,... Motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper zl TECHNOLOGIES INC.. ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale parties who disagree may wish continue... The Adobe Website do not need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website SIMM,! Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help LTD V. SOON, ET AL 's SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS BANK. ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 alendar Line 3 & TECH., INC. E.... Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted CourtCall is this envelope shortly and DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA V.!